forgejo/models/organization/TestInconsistentOwnerTeam/team_unit.yml

-
  id: 1000
  team_id: 1000
  type: 1
  access_mode: 0 # None

-
  id: 1001
  team_id: 1000
  type: 2
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1002
  team_id: 1000
  type: 3
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1003
  team_id: 1000
  type: 4
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1004
  team_id: 1000
  type: 5
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1005
  team_id: 1000
  type: 6
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1006
  team_id: 1000
  type: 7
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1007
  team_id: 1000
  type: 8
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1008
  team_id: 1000
  type: 9
  access_mode: 0

-
  id: 1009
  team_id: 1000
  type: 10
  access_mode: 0
[BUG] Don't allow owner team with incorrect unit access - On editting a team, only update the units if the team isn't the 'Owners' team. Otherwise the 'Owners' team end up having all of their unit access modes set to 'None'; because the request form doesn't send over any units, as it's simply not shown in the UI. - Adds a database inconstency check and fix for the case where the 'Owners' team is affected by this bug. - Adds unit test. - Adds integration test. - Resolves #5528 - Regression of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24012 2024-10-11 14:48:47 +02:00			`-`
			`id: 1000`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 1`
			`access_mode: 0 # None`

			`-`
			`id: 1001`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 2`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1002`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 3`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1003`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 4`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1004`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 5`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1005`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 6`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1006`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 7`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1007`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 8`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1008`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 9`
			`access_mode: 0`

			`-`
			`id: 1009`
			`team_id: 1000`
			`type: 10`
			`access_mode: 0`