forgejo/services/issue/issue.go

332 lines
10 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package issue
import (
"context"
"fmt"
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
"time"
activities_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/activities"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
access_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/perm/access"
project_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/project"
repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
system_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/system"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/git"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/storage"
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/timeutil"
notify_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/notify"
)
// NewIssue creates new issue with labels for repository.
func NewIssue(ctx context.Context, repo *repo_model.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue, labelIDs []int64, uuids []string, assigneeIDs []int64) error {
if err := issues_model.NewIssue(ctx, repo, issue, labelIDs, uuids); err != nil {
return err
}
2019-10-28 17:45:43 +01:00
for _, assigneeID := range assigneeIDs {
if _, err := AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned(ctx, issue, issue.Poster, assigneeID, true); err != nil {
2019-10-28 17:45:43 +01:00
return err
}
}
mentions, err := issues_model.FindAndUpdateIssueMentions(ctx, issue, issue.Poster, issue.Content)
if err != nil {
return err
}
notify_service.NewIssue(ctx, issue, mentions)
if len(issue.Labels) > 0 {
notify_service.IssueChangeLabels(ctx, issue.Poster, issue, issue.Labels, nil)
}
if issue.Milestone != nil {
notify_service.IssueChangeMilestone(ctx, issue.Poster, issue, 0)
}
return nil
}
// ChangeTitle changes the title of this issue, as the given user.
func ChangeTitle(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, doer *user_model.User, title string) error {
oldTitle := issue.Title
issue.Title = title
if oldTitle == title {
return nil
}
if err := issues_model.ChangeIssueTitle(ctx, issue, doer, oldTitle); err != nil {
return err
}
if issue.IsPull && issues_model.HasWorkInProgressPrefix(oldTitle) && !issues_model.HasWorkInProgressPrefix(title) {
if err := issues_model.PullRequestCodeOwnersReview(ctx, issue, issue.PullRequest); err != nil {
return err
}
}
notify_service.IssueChangeTitle(ctx, doer, issue, oldTitle)
return nil
}
// ChangeIssueRef changes the branch of this issue, as the given user.
func ChangeIssueRef(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, doer *user_model.User, ref string) error {
oldRef := issue.Ref
issue.Ref = ref
if err := issues_model.ChangeIssueRef(ctx, issue, doer, oldRef); err != nil {
return err
}
notify_service.IssueChangeRef(ctx, doer, issue, oldRef)
return nil
}
// UpdateAssignees is a helper function to add or delete one or multiple issue assignee(s)
// Deleting is done the GitHub way (quote from their api documentation):
// https://developer.github.com/v3/issues/#edit-an-issue
// "assignees" (array): Logins for Users to assign to this issue.
// Pass one or more user logins to replace the set of assignees on this Issue.
// Send an empty array ([]) to clear all assignees from the Issue.
func UpdateAssignees(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, oneAssignee string, multipleAssignees []string, doer *user_model.User) (err error) {
var allNewAssignees []*user_model.User
// Keep the old assignee thingy for compatibility reasons
if oneAssignee != "" {
// Prevent double adding assignees
var isDouble bool
for _, assignee := range multipleAssignees {
if assignee == oneAssignee {
isDouble = true
break
}
}
if !isDouble {
multipleAssignees = append(multipleAssignees, oneAssignee)
}
}
// Loop through all assignees to add them
for _, assigneeName := range multipleAssignees {
assignee, err := user_model.GetUserByName(ctx, assigneeName)
if err != nil {
return err
}
allNewAssignees = append(allNewAssignees, assignee)
}
// Delete all old assignees not passed
if err = DeleteNotPassedAssignee(ctx, issue, doer, allNewAssignees); err != nil {
return err
}
// Add all new assignees
// Update the assignee. The function will check if the user exists, is already
// assigned (which he shouldn't as we deleted all assignees before) and
// has access to the repo.
for _, assignee := range allNewAssignees {
// Extra method to prevent double adding (which would result in removing)
_, err = AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned(ctx, issue, doer, assignee.ID, true)
if err != nil {
return err
}
}
return err
}
// DeleteIssue deletes an issue
func DeleteIssue(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, gitRepo *git.Repository, issue *issues_model.Issue) error {
// load issue before deleting it
if err := issue.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := issue.LoadPullRequest(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
// delete entries in database
if err := deleteIssue(ctx, issue); err != nil {
return err
}
// delete pull request related git data
if issue.IsPull && gitRepo != nil {
if err := gitRepo.RemoveReference(fmt.Sprintf("%s%d/head", git.PullPrefix, issue.PullRequest.Index)); err != nil {
return err
}
}
// If the Issue is pinned, we should unpin it before deletion to avoid problems with other pinned Issues
if issue.IsPinned() {
if err := issue.Unpin(ctx, doer); err != nil {
return err
}
}
notify_service.DeleteIssue(ctx, doer, issue)
return nil
}
// AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned adds an assignee only if he isn't already assigned to the issue.
// Also checks for access of assigned user
func AddAssigneeIfNotAssigned(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, doer *user_model.User, assigneeID int64, notify bool) (comment *issues_model.Comment, err error) {
assignee, err := user_model.GetUserByID(ctx, assigneeID)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Check if the user is already assigned
isAssigned, err := issues_model.IsUserAssignedToIssue(ctx, issue, assignee)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if isAssigned {
// nothing to to
return nil, nil
}
valid, err := access_model.CanBeAssigned(ctx, assignee, issue.Repo, issue.IsPull)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if !valid {
return nil, repo_model.ErrUserDoesNotHaveAccessToRepo{UserID: assigneeID, RepoName: issue.Repo.Name}
}
if notify {
_, comment, err = ToggleAssigneeWithNotify(ctx, issue, doer, assigneeID)
return comment, err
}
_, comment, err = issues_model.ToggleIssueAssignee(ctx, issue, doer, assigneeID)
return comment, err
}
// GetRefEndNamesAndURLs retrieves the ref end names (e.g. refs/heads/branch-name -> branch-name)
// and their respective URLs.
func GetRefEndNamesAndURLs(issues []*issues_model.Issue, repoLink string) (map[int64]string, map[int64]string) {
issueRefEndNames := make(map[int64]string, len(issues))
issueRefURLs := make(map[int64]string, len(issues))
for _, issue := range issues {
if issue.Ref != "" {
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634) This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the code more maintainable. Fix #15367 Replaces #23070 It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed. We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git remote update origin` to do the sync. Some answer from ChatGPT as ref. > If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected, there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check: > >Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your system. You can check the version by running git --version in your terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if that resolves the issue. > >Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config --get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes +refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*". > >Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags origin to list all the tags on the remote repository. > >Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete local tags using the git tag -d command. --------- Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 03:04:48 +02:00
issueRefEndNames[issue.ID] = git.RefName(issue.Ref).ShortName()
Prepend refs/heads/ to issue template refs (#20461) Fix #20456 At some point during the 1.17 cycle abbreviated refishs to issue branches started breaking. This is likely due serious inconsistencies in our management of refs throughout Gitea - which is a bug needing to be addressed in a different PR. (Likely more than one) We should try to use non-abbreviated `fullref`s as much as possible. That is where a user has inputted a abbreviated `refish` we should add `refs/heads/` if it is `branch` etc. I know people keep writing and merging PRs that remove prefixes from stored content but it is just wrong and it keeps causing problems like this. We should only remove the prefix at the time of presentation as the prefix is the only way of knowing umambiguously and permanently if the `ref` is referring to a `branch`, `tag` or `commit` / `SHA`. We need to make it so that every ref has the appropriate prefix, and probably also need to come up with some definitely unambiguous way of storing `SHA`s if they're used in a `ref` or `refish` field. We must not store a potentially ambiguous `refish` as a `ref`. (Especially when referring a `tag` - there is no reason why users cannot create a `branch` with the same short name as a `tag` and vice versa and any attempt to prevent this will fail. You can even create a `branch` and a `tag` that matches the `SHA` pattern.) To that end in order to fix this bug, when parsing issue templates check the provided `Ref` (here a `refish` because almost all users do not know or understand the subtly), if it does not start with `refs/` add the `BranchPrefix` to it. This allows people to make their templates refer to a `tag` but not to a `SHA` directly. (I don't think that is particularly unreasonable but if people disagree I can make the `refish` be checked to see if it matches the `SHA` pattern.) Next we need to handle the issue links that are already written. The links here are created with `git.RefURL` Here we see there is a bug introduced in #17551 whereby the provided `ref` argument can be double-escaped so we remove the incorrect external escape. (The escape added in #17551 is in the right place - unfortunately I missed that the calling function was doing the wrong thing.) Then within `RefURL()` we check if an unprefixed `ref` (therefore potentially a `refish`) matches the `SHA` pattern before assuming that is actually a `commit` - otherwise is assumed to be a `branch`. This will handle most of the problem cases excepting the very unusual cases where someone has deliberately written a `branch` to look like a `SHA1`. But please if something is called a `ref` or interpreted as a `ref` make it a full-ref before storing or using it. By all means if something is a `branch` assume the prefix is removed but always add it back in if you are using it as a `ref`. Stop storing abbreviated `branch` names and `tag` names - which are `refish` as a `ref`. It will keep on causing problems like this. Fix #20456 Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net> Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv> Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-22 13:58:49 +01:00
issueRefURLs[issue.ID] = git.RefURL(repoLink, issue.Ref)
}
}
return issueRefEndNames, issueRefURLs
}
// deleteIssue deletes the issue
func deleteIssue(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue) error {
ctx, committer, err := db.TxContext(ctx)
if err != nil {
return err
}
defer committer.Close()
e := db.GetEngine(ctx)
if _, err := e.ID(issue.ID).NoAutoCondition().Delete(issue); err != nil {
return err
}
// update the total issue numbers
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepoIssueNumbers(ctx, issue.RepoID, issue.IsPull, false); err != nil {
return err
}
// if the issue is closed, update the closed issue numbers
if issue.IsClosed {
if err := repo_model.UpdateRepoIssueNumbers(ctx, issue.RepoID, issue.IsPull, true); err != nil {
return err
}
}
if err := issues_model.UpdateMilestoneCounters(ctx, issue.MilestoneID); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("error updating counters for milestone id %d: %w",
issue.MilestoneID, err)
}
if err := activities_model.DeleteIssueActions(ctx, issue.RepoID, issue.ID, issue.Index); err != nil {
return err
}
// find attachments related to this issue and remove them
if err := issue.LoadAttributes(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
for i := range issue.Attachments {
system_model.RemoveStorageWithNotice(ctx, storage.Attachments, "Delete issue attachment", issue.Attachments[i].RelativePath())
}
// delete all database data still assigned to this issue
if err := db.DeleteBeans(ctx,
&issues_model.ContentHistory{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Comment{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueLabel{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueDependency{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueAssignees{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueUser{IssueID: issue.ID},
&activities_model.Notification{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Reaction{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueWatch{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Stopwatch{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.TrackedTime{IssueID: issue.ID},
&project_model.ProjectIssue{IssueID: issue.ID},
&repo_model.Attachment{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.PullRequest{IssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Comment{RefIssueID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.IssueDependency{DependencyID: issue.ID},
&issues_model.Comment{DependentIssueID: issue.ID},
); err != nil {
return err
}
return committer.Commit()
}
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying an issue through the API. A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct. If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled. That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if requested. A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature to project's owners and admins. (cherry picked from commit c524d33402c76bc4cccea2806f289e08a009baae) Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided. (cherry picked from commit f061caa6555e0c9e922ee1e73dd2e4337360e9fe) Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels. The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's labels. (cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f58f0ab20c565a8f5d063b90fd741f97) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 96150971ca31b97e97e84d5f5eb95a177cc44e2e) Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a28581003545256632213bf4136b193d) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to the issue as the update creation date. (cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc6cba48ca4fe07d1a916d1f1a4b37b4) Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to the issue as an update date. (cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fdb8e6273fdc35d7b5cc164b400207e9) Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset creation date. (cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d39db7a4256cd9abf9c58b8d3e1b5c14) Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date Those unit tests are added: - TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate (cherry picked from commit da932152f1deb3039a399516a51c8b6757059c91) Pettier code to set the update time of comments Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...) XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all columns + updated_unix. (cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808dd739c0c2e49e6b7ae2967f120f43c2) Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates. When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided. If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater value. This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's update dates. (cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e6b49e933dc6534040160dd739ff18a) Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test to check update dates on milestones. The tests related to 'AutoDate' are: - TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate - TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate - TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate - TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate - TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate - TestAPIEditCommentWithDate - TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate (cherry picked from commit 961fd13c551b3e50040acb7c914a00ead92de63f) (cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44692ee773010cb66a69a603663947d5) (cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43155ca8cf5ab1a4a246babfb829db16) Conflicts: services/issue/issue.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415 (cherry picked from commit 56720ade008c09122d825959171aa5346d645987) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462 (cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6c7e7a50298fa67efad1e73723a0981) (cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965cde401976821083c3250b404954ecc) (cherry picked from commit f02aeb76981cd688ceaf6613f142a8a725be1437) Conflicts: routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575 (cherry picked from commit d072525b35e44faf7ff87143c0e52b8ba8a625c8) (cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3df75ac3ffa30f42d398e22995ada5e7) (cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec788b54afd9da5b9193ce06ee8ec562b) (cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd01c7ddc65d8b0f326f9c19cb53b58e) [FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676) [this is a follow-up to PR #764] When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B. ----- Comment: While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies... I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676 Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org> (cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63a2dd746dd84a31ebf7f70d5b5d7c52) (cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9010ba8cdca0e0f37f765f8800e9fe1)
2023-10-09 19:07:47 +02:00
// Set the UpdatedUnix date and the NoAutoTime field of an Issue if a non
// nil 'updated' time is provided
//
// In order to set a specific update time, the DB will be updated with
// NoAutoTime(). A 'NoAutoTime' boolean field in the Issue struct is used to
// propagate down to the DB update calls the will to apply autoupdate or not.
func SetIssueUpdateDate(ctx context.Context, issue *issues_model.Issue, updated *time.Time, doer *user_model.User) error {
issue.NoAutoTime = false
if updated == nil {
return nil
}
if err := issue.LoadRepo(ctx); err != nil {
return err
}
// Check if the poster is allowed to set an update date
perm, err := access_model.GetUserRepoPermission(ctx, issue.Repo, doer)
if err != nil {
return err
}
if !perm.IsAdmin() && !perm.IsOwner() {
return fmt.Errorf("user needs to have admin or owner right")
}
// A simple guard against potential inconsistent calls
updatedUnix := timeutil.TimeStamp(updated.Unix())
if updatedUnix < issue.CreatedUnix || updatedUnix > timeutil.TimeStampNow() {
return fmt.Errorf("unallowed update date")
}
issue.UpdatedUnix = updatedUnix
issue.NoAutoTime = true
return nil
}