Commit graph

212 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
0ko
4ef8b139f2 [GITEA] Apply changes to archived labels
This is a squashed result of conflict resolution for the following commits from Gitea:
- 36de5b299b
- 9a93b1816e
- 712e19fa6f
- 83850cc479

It is lacking CSS rule for archived labels, though.

Changes in this commit are authored by:
- 6543
- delvh
- silverwind

(cherry picked from commit 4b09dd11ec)
2024-04-03 20:14:39 +00:00
Kemal Zebari
23676bfea7
Prevent re-review and dismiss review actions on closed and merged PRs (#30065)
Resolves #29965.

---
Manually tested this by:
- Following the
[installation](https://docs.gitea.com/next/installation/install-with-docker#basics)
guide (but built a local Docker image instead)
- Creating 2 users, one who is the `Owner` of a newly-created repository
and the other a `Collaborator`
- Had the `Collaborator` create a PR that the `Owner` reviews
- `Collaborator` resolves conversation and `Owner` merges PR

And with this change we see that we can no longer see re-request review
button for the `Owner`:

<img width="1351" alt="Screenshot 2024-03-25 at 12 39 18 AM"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/60799661/bcd9c579-3cf7-474f-a51e-b436fe1a39a4">

(cherry picked from commit 242b331260925e604150346e61329097d5731e77)
2024-03-30 07:17:32 +01:00
Denys Konovalov
8ffb9c6fb1
Add default board to new projects, remove uncategorized pseudo-board (#29874)
On creation of an empty project (no template) a default board will be
created instead of falling back to the uneditable pseudo-board.

Every project now has to have exactly one default boards. As a
consequence, you cannot unset a board as default, instead you have to
set another board as default. Existing projects will be modified using a
cron job, additionally this check will run every midnight by default.

Deleting the default board is not allowed, you have to set another board
as default to do it.

Fixes #29873
Fixes #14679 along the way
Fixes #29853

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
(cherry picked from commit e5160185ed65fd1c2bcb2fc7dc7e0b5514ddb299)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	trivial conflict because Forgejo strings do not have
	surrounding double quotes
2024-03-30 07:17:31 +01:00
yp05327
fa87a57b59
Load attachments for code comments (#30124)
Fix #30103

ps: comments has `LoadAttributes`, but maybe considering performance
problem, we don't call it.

(cherry picked from commit ce3c3512265df3b4940672be40065c4fb415ef95)
2024-03-30 07:17:31 +01:00
Jason Song
2c4e85421e
Fix misuse of TxContext (#30061)
Help #29999, or its tests cannot pass.

Also, add some comments to clarify the usage of `TxContext`.

I don't check all usages of `TxContext` because there are too many
(almost 140+). It's a better idea to replace them with `WithTx` instead
of checking them one by one. However, that may be another refactoring
PR.

(cherry picked from commit c6c4d66004c70b24abc8048b39b660b8361a0395)
2024-03-30 07:17:29 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
9ca245ad96
Use db.ListOptions directly instead of Paginator interface to make it easier to use and fix performance of /pulls and /issues (#29990)
This PR uses `db.ListOptions` instead of `Paginor` to make the code
simpler.
And it also fixed the performance problem when viewing /pulls or
/issues. Before the counting in fact will also do the search.

---------

Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
(cherry picked from commit 3f26fe2fa2c7141c9e622297e50a70f3e0003e4d)
2024-03-30 07:17:29 +01:00
Jimmy Praet
003881b06d
[Port] gitea#29842: Notify reviewers added via CODEOWNERS
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28297

This PR also fixed a problem that it needs a database transaction when
removing the WIP title.

---

Resolves #2771
Also partially ports gitea#29783

(cherry picked from commit 17d7ab5ad4ce3d0fbc1251572c22687c237a30b1)
2024-03-28 14:58:39 +01:00
Earl Warren
ceea9c4334
Revert "avoid superfluous synchronized pull_request run when opening a PR"
The fix against the race incorrectly assumes the sha of the commit being
pushed belongs to the base repository. It finds the highest possible
pull request ID from the head repository instead of looking it up in
the base repository.

Figuring out if a PR was created in the future based on the highest
index of the base repository would require collecting all of them
because there is no way to know in advance which repository may be
involved in the race.

Fixing this race can be done either by:

* Introducing a new field in the pull_request table https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2842
  which feels more like a hack than a real solution
* Refactoring the logic
  which would be a significant undertaking

The race has been in the codebase for a very long time and manifests
itself in the CI, when events happen in quick succession. The only
concrete manifestation was however fixed by https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009

Since this race now only exists in theory and not in practice, let's
revert this bugous commit until a proper solution is implemented.

Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2817

This reverts commit 036f1eddc5.

Conflicts:
	services/pull/pull.go
2024-03-28 07:08:17 +01:00
wxiaoguang
e5920b4a62
Refactor StringsToInt64s (#29967)
And close #27176

(cherry picked from commit cdb4d1a8db096d60dba04728924dab85def45b19)
2024-03-26 19:04:26 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
d92c2048b3
Performance improvements for pull request list page (#29900)
This PR will avoid load pullrequest.Issue twice in pull request list
page. It will reduce x times database queries for those WIP pull
requests.

Partially fix #29585

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 62f8174aa2fae1481c7e17a6afcb731a5b178cd0)

Conflicts:
	models/activities/notification_list.go
	moved to models/activities/notification.go
2024-03-26 19:04:26 +01:00
oliverpool
c0fb62cb5a fix action fixtures 2024-03-24 07:12:31 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
d996c5d517
Some performance optimization on dashboard and issues page (#29010)
This PR do some loading speed optimization for feeds user interface
pages.
- Load action users batchly but not one by one.
- Load action repositories batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's Repo Owners batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible issues batchly but not one by one.
- Load action's possible comments batchly but not one by one.

(cherry picked from commit aed3b53abdd02a3ffbf9e8eb90272ff567333073)
2024-03-20 08:46:28 +01:00
pengqiseven
e825d007b1
remove repetitive words (#29695)
Signed-off-by: pengqiseven <912170095@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7f856d5d742dcb6febdb8a3f22cd9a8fecc69a4d)
2024-03-20 08:46:28 +01:00
6543
d5319feb85 Refactor code_indexer to use an SearchOptions struct for PerformSearch (#29724)
similar to how it's already done for the issue_indexer

---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*

Conflicts:
	routers/web/repo/search.go
2024-03-18 12:25:05 +00:00
Gusted
a4cc37b46a
[BUG] Use correct headcommitid
Regression of #2507, which switched the HEAD from `pr.GetGitRefName()`
to `pr.HeadCommitID` but it had to be `prInfo.HeadCommitID`. Resolves #2656
I was able to reproduce this locally with _some_ pull requests, haven't
been able to get a reproducer trough integration testing.
2024-03-14 16:15:56 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
3d9afe8813
Move get/set default branch from git package to gitrepo package to hide repopath (#29126)
(cherry picked from commit 25b842df261452a29570ba89ffc3a4842d73f68c)

Conflicts:
	routers/web/repo/wiki.go
	services/repository/branch.go
	services/repository/migrate.go
	services/wiki/wiki.go
	also apply to Forgejo specific usage of the refactored functions
2024-03-11 23:36:59 +07:00
Gusted
b9e27b64e6 Merge pull request '[BUG] Disable CODEOWNERS for forked repositories' (#2537) from gusted/forgejo-codeowner-forked into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2537
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-03-06 18:18:58 +00:00
6543
e2371743d5
remove util.OptionalBool and related functions (#29513)
and migrate affected code

_last refactoring bits to replace **util.OptionalBool** with
**optional.Option[bool]**_

(cherry picked from commit a3f05d0d98408bb47333b19f505b21afcefa9e7c)

Conflicts:
	services/repository/branch.go
	trivial context conflict
2024-03-06 12:10:46 +08:00
wxiaoguang
68099f2f00
Refactor some Str2html code (#29397)
This PR touches the most interesting part of the "template refactoring".

1. Unclear variable type. Especially for "web/feed/convert.go":
sometimes it uses text, sometimes it uses HTML.
2. Assign text content to "RenderedContent" field, for example: `
project.RenderedContent = project.Description` in web/org/projects.go
3. Assign rendered content to text field, for example: `r.Note =
rendered content` in web/repo/release.go
4. (possible) Incorrectly calling `{{Str2html
.PackageDescriptor.Metadata.ReleaseNotes}}` in
package/content/nuget.tmpl, I guess the name Str2html misleads
developers to use it to "render string to html", but it only sanitizes.
if ReleaseNotes really contains HTML, then this is not a problem.

(cherry picked from commit e71eb8930a5d0f60874b038c223498b41ad65592)

Conflicts:
	modules/templates/util_string.go
	trivial context conflict
2024-03-06 12:10:44 +08:00
Gusted
2658d4361e
[BUG] Disable CODEOWNERS for forked repositories
- Disable the CODEOWNERS feature for forked repositories, as it would
otherwise inadvertently request reviewers when for example a pull
request is opened against a forked repository to propose changes to an
existant pull request in the original repository.
- Adds integration test.
- Resolves #2525
2024-03-01 23:19:18 +01:00
Gusted
331fa44956
[BUG] Ensure HasIssueContentHistory takes into account comment_id
- The content history table contains the content history of issues and
comments. For issues they are saved with an comment id of zero.
- If you want to check if the issue has an content history, it should
take into account that SQL has `comment_id = 0`, as it otherwise could
return incorrect results when for example the issue already has an
comment that has an content history.
- Fix the code of `HasIssueContentHistory` to take this into account, it
relied on XORM to generate the SQL from the non-default values of the
struct, this wouldn't generate the `comment_id = 0` SQL as `0` is the
default value of an integer.
- Remove an unncessary log (it's not the responsibility of `models`
code to do logging).
- Adds unit test.
- Resolves #2513
2024-02-29 18:23:06 +01:00
Gusted
fb2795b5bb
[BUG] Correct changed files for codeowners
- The CODEOWNER feature relies on the changed files to determine which
reviewers should be added according to the `CODEOWNER` file.
- The current approach was to 'diff' between the base and head branch,
which seems logical but fail in practice when the pull request is out of
date with the base branch. Therefore it should instead diff between the
head branch and the merge base of the head and base branch, so only the
actual affected files by the pull requests are used, the same approach
is used by the diff of an unmerged pull request.
- Add integration testing (for the feature as well).
- Resolves #2458
2024-02-27 23:16:00 +01:00
Jimmy Praet
f95fb8cc44 Add attachment support for code review comments (#29220)
Fixes #27960, #24411, #12183

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-02-27 18:35:43 +00:00
Zettat123
77c56e29de
Allow non-admin users to delete review requests (#29057)
Fix #14459

The following users can add/remove review requests of a PR
- the poster of the PR
- the owner or collaborators of the repository
- members with read permission on the pull requests unit

(cherry picked from commit c42083a33950be6ee9f822c6d0de3c3a79d1f51b)

Conflicts:
	models/repo/repo_list_test.go
	tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
	tests/integration/api_repo_test.go
	shared fixture counts
2024-02-26 22:30:27 +01:00
qwerty287
1608ef0ce9
Add API to get merged PR of a commit (#29243)
Adds a new API `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{sha}/pull` that allows
you to get the merged PR associated to a commit.

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
(cherry picked from commit 0a426cc575734e5eff410d6a790f40473117f753)
2024-02-26 22:30:26 +01:00
6543
f796548225
Workaround to clean up old reviews on creating a new one (#28554)
close  #28542

blocks  #28544

---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*

(cherry picked from commit 217d71c48a10265e08b95cc961656b921f61f9ff)

Conflicts:
	tests/integration/api_pull_review_test.go
	context
2024-02-26 21:42:14 +01:00
qwerty287
feb189554e
Add API to get PR by base/head (#29242)
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16289

Add a new API `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{base}/{head}` to get a PR by
its base and head branch.
2024-02-26 03:41:42 +01:00
yp05327
78f6b29248
Fix gitea-action user avatar broken on edited menu (#29190)
Fix #29178

(cherry picked from commit 8e2831611c06e84dd8fedf7a0b2cce9f98d4188f)
2024-02-17 23:24:31 +01:00
wxiaoguang
65248945c9
Refactor locale&string&template related code (#29165)
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)

And help PRs like  #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.

(cherry picked from commit f3eb835886031df7a562abc123c3f6011c81eca8)

Conflicts:
	modules/web/middleware/binding.go
	routers/web/feed/convert.go
	tests/integration/branches_test.go
	tests/integration/repo_branch_test.go
	trivial context conflicts
2024-02-16 15:20:52 +01:00
KN4CK3R
6eaabb1a9d
Use ghost user if user was not found (#29161)
Fixes #29159

(cherry picked from commit 37061e8266806c0b2b66ac64138e725632b295db)
2024-02-16 15:20:52 +01:00
oliverpool
0fc61c8836 [BUG] split code conversations in diff tab (#2306)
Follow-up of #2282 and #2296 (which tried to address #2278)

One of the issue with the previous PR is that when a conversation on the Files tab was marked as "resolved", it would fetch all the comments for that line (even the outdated ones, which should not be shown on this page - except when explicitly activated).

To properly fix this, I have changed `FetchCodeCommentsByLine` to `FetchCodeConversation`. Its role is to fetch all comments related to a given (review, path, line) and reverted my changes in the template (which were based on a misunderstanding).

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2306
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
2024-02-16 12:16:11 +00:00
Earl Warren
c8b177713a
[CLEANUP] make golangci-lint@v1.56.1 happy 2024-02-15 16:19:36 +01:00
6543
e9e6c6152e
Dont load Review if Comment is CommentTypeReviewRequest (#28551)
RequestReview get deleted on review.
So we don't have to try to load them on comments.

broken out #28544

(cherry picked from commit 6fad2c874438275d3f69bb1cc223708bd2d27ff6)
2024-02-14 21:44:25 +01:00
Earl Warren
094c84ed6d
Merge branch 'rebase-forgejo-dependency' into wip-forgejo 2024-02-05 18:58:23 +01:00
Earl Warren
036f1eddc5
[GITEA] avoid superfluous synchronized pull_request run when opening a PR (#2236)
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* Before scheduling the task, AddTestPullRequestTask stores the max
  index of the repository
* When the task runs, it does not take into account pull requests that
  have an index higher than the recorded max index

When AddTestPullRequestTask is called with isSync == true, it is the
direct consequence of a new commit being pushed. Forgejo knows nothing
of this new commit yet. If a PR is created later and its head
references the new commit, it will have an index that is higher and
must not be taken into account. It would be acting and triggering a
notification for a PR based on an event that happened before it
existed.

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2236
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
(cherry picked from commit b3be895a30)
2024-02-05 16:57:58 +01:00
Gusted
5c0894a588
[GITEA] Avoid WHERE IN for comment migration query
- Rewrite `UpdateCommentsMigrationsByType` to not use `WHERE IN` as
that's a performance diaster for MariaDB, it now use batching to query
the the relevant comment IDs via JOINs (which is not possible in a
UPDATE query for SQLite) and then update them in a seperate query.
- Add unit test.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1856

(cherry picked from commit 8098ca9d2e)

Conflicts:
	models/issues/comment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2075
(cherry picked from commit ca65deba1c)
(cherry picked from commit 0e1e09e77d)
(cherry picked from commit 19013ba5ea)
(cherry picked from commit 23c887f97e)
(cherry picked from commit b3321d1a84)
2024-02-05 16:09:42 +01:00
Gusted
2da33aae2d
[MODERATION] User blocking
- Add the ability to block a user via their profile page.
- This will unstar their repositories and visa versa.
- Blocked users cannot create issues or pull requests on your the doer's repositories (mind that this is not the case for organizations).
- Blocked users cannot comment on the doer's opened issues or pull requests.
- Blocked users cannot add reactions to doer's comments.
- Blocked users cannot cause a notification trough mentioning the doer.

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/540
(cherry picked from commit 687d852480)
(cherry picked from commit 0c32a4fde5)
(cherry picked from commit 1791130e3c)
(cherry picked from commit 37858b7e8f)
(cherry picked from commit a3e2bfd7e9)
(cherry picked from commit 7009b9fe87)

Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014
        routers/web/user/profile.go
        templates/user/profile.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit b2aec34791)
(cherry picked from commit e2f1b73752)

[MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802)

- Resolves #476
- Follow up for: #540
- Ensure that the doer and blocked person cannot follow each other.
- Ensure that the block person cannot watch doer's repositories.
- Add unblock button to the blocked user list.
- Add blocked since information to the blocked user list.
- Add extra testing to moderation code.
- Blocked user will unwatch doer's owned repository upon blocking.
- Add flash messages to let the user know the block/unblock action was successful.
- Add "You haven't blocked any users" message.
- Add organization blocking a user.

Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/802
(cherry picked from commit 0505a10421)
(cherry picked from commit 37b4e6ef9b)
(cherry picked from commit c17c121f2c)

[MODERATION] organization blocking a user (#802) (squash)

Changes to adapt to:

  6bbccdd177 Improve AJAX link and modal confirm dialog (#25210)

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882/files#issuecomment-945962
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/882#issue-330561
(cherry picked from commit 523635f83c)
(cherry picked from commit 4743eaa6a0)
(cherry picked from commit eff5b43d2e)

Conflicts: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1014
        routers/web/user/profile.go
(cherry picked from commit 9d359be5ed)
(cherry picked from commit b1f3069a22)

[MODERATION] add user blocking API

- Follow up for: #540, #802
- Add API routes for user blocking from user and organization
perspective.
- The new routes have integration testing.
- The new model functions have unit tests.
- Actually quite boring to write and to read this pull request.

(cherry picked from commit f3afaf15c7)
(cherry picked from commit 6d754db3e5)
(cherry picked from commit 2a89ddc0ac)
(cherry picked from commit 4a147bff7e)

Conflicts:
        routers/api/v1/api.go
        templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
(cherry picked from commit bb8c339185)
(cherry picked from commit 5a11569a01)
(cherry picked from commit 2373c801ee)

[MODERATION] restore redirect on unblock

 ctx.RedirectToFirst(ctx.FormString("redirect_to"), ctx.ContextUser.HomeLink())

was replaced by

 ctx.JSONOK()

in 128d77a3a Following up fixes for "Fix inconsistent user profile layout across tabs" (#25739)

thus changing the behavior (nicely spotted by the tests). This
restores it.

(cherry picked from commit 597c243707)
(cherry picked from commit cfa539e590)

[MODERATION] Add test case (squash)

- Add an test case, to test an property of the function.

(cherry picked from commit 70dadb1916)

[MODERATION] Block adding collaborators

- Ensure that the doer and blocked user cannot add each other as
collaborators to repositories.
- The Web UI gets an detailed message of the specific situation, the API
gets an generic Forbidden code.
- Unit tests has been added.
- Integration testing for Web and API has been added.
- This commit doesn't introduce removing each other as collaborators on
the block action, due to the complexity of database calls that needs to
be figured out. That deserves its own commit and test code.

(cherry picked from commit 747be949a1)

[MODERATION] move locale_en-US.ini strings to avoid conflicts

Conflicts:
        web_src/css/org.css
        web_src/css/user.css
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1180

(cherry picked from commit e53f955c88)

Conflicts:
        services/issue/comments.go
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1212
(cherry picked from commit b4a454b576)

Conflicts:
        models/forgejo_migrations/migrate.go
        options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
        services/pull/pull.go
        https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1264

[MODERATION] Remove blocked user collaborations with doer

- When the doer blocks an user, who is also an collaborator on an
repository that the doer owns, remove that collaboration.
- Added unit tests.
- Refactor the unit test to be more organized.

(cherry picked from commit ec87016178)
(cherry picked from commit 313e6174d8)

[MODERATION] QoL improvements (squash)

- Ensure that organisations cannot be blocked. It currently has no
effect, as all blocked operations cannot be executed from an
organisation standpoint.
- Refactored the API route to make use of the `UserAssignmentAPI`
middleware.
- Make more use of `t.Run` so that the test code is more clear about
which block of code belongs to which test case.
- Added more integration testing (to ensure the organisations cannot be
blocked and some authorization/permission checks).

(cherry picked from commit e9d638d075)

[MODERATION] s/{{avatar/{{ctx.AvatarUtils.Avatar/

(cherry picked from commit ce8b30be13)
(cherry picked from commit f911dc4025)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1354
(cherry picked from commit c1b37b7fda)
(cherry picked from commit 856a2e0903)

[MODERATION] Show graceful error on comment creation

- When someone is blocked by the repository owner or issue poster and
try to comment on that issue, they get shown a graceful error.
- Adds integration test.

(cherry picked from commit 490646302e)
(cherry picked from commit d3d88667cb)
(cherry picked from commit 6818de13a9)

[MODERATION] Show graceful error on comment creation (squash) typo

(cherry picked from commit 1588d4834a)
(cherry picked from commit d510ea52d0)
(cherry picked from commit 8249e93a14)

[MODERATION] Refactor integration testing (squash)

- Motivation for this PR is that I'd noticed that a lot of repeated
calls are happening between the test functions and that certain tests
weren't using helper functions like `GetCSRF`, therefor this refactor of
the integration tests to keep it: clean, small and hopefully more
maintainable and understandable.
- There are now three integration tests: `TestBlockUser`,
`TestBlockUserFromOrganization` and `TestBlockActions` (and has been
moved in that order in the source code).
- `TestBlockUser` is for doing blocking related actions as an user and
`TestBlockUserFromOrganization` as an organisation, even though they
execute the same kind of tests they do not share any database calls or
logic and therefor it currently doesn't make sense to merge them
together (hopefully such oppurtinutiy might be presented in the future).
- `TestBlockActions` now contain all tests for actions that should be
blocked after blocking has happened, most tests now share the same doer
and blocked users and a extra fixture has been added to make this
possible for the comment test.
- Less code, more comments and more re-use between tests.

(cherry picked from commit ffb393213d)
(cherry picked from commit 85505e0f81)
(cherry picked from commit 0f3cf17761)

[MODERATION] Fix network error (squash)

- Fix network error toast messages on user actions such as follow and
unfollow. This happened because the javascript code now expects an JSON
to be returned, but this wasn't the case due to
cfa539e590127b4953b010fba3dea21c82a1714.
- The integration testing has been adjusted to instead test for the
returned flash cookie.

(cherry picked from commit 112bc25e54)
(cherry picked from commit 1194fe4899)
(cherry picked from commit 9abb95a844)

[MODERATION] Modernize frontend (squash)

- Unify blocked users list.
- Use the new flex list classes for blocked users list to avoid using
the CSS helper classes and thereby be consistent in the design.
- Fix the modal by using the new modal class.
- Remove the icon in the modal as looks too big in the new design.
- Fix avatar not displaying as it was passing the context where the user
should've been passed.
- Don't use italics for 'Blocked since' text.
- Use namelink template to display the user's name and homelink.

(cherry picked from commit ec935a16a3)
(cherry picked from commit 67f37c8346)

Conflicts:
	models/user/follow.go
	models/user/user_test.go
	routers/api/v1/user/follower.go
	routers/web/shared/user/header.go
	routers/web/user/profile.go
	templates/swagger/v1_json.tmpl
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1468
(cherry picked from commit 6a9626839c)

Conflicts:
	tests/integration/api_nodeinfo_test.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1508#issuecomment-1242385
(cherry picked from commit 7378b251b4)

Conflicts:
	models/fixtures/watch.yml
	models/issues/reaction.go
	models/issues/reaction_test.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_reaction.go
	routers/web/repo/issue.go
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1547
(cherry picked from commit c2028930c1)
(cherry picked from commit d3f9134aee)
(cherry picked from commit 7afe154c5c)
(cherry picked from commit 99ac7353eb)
(cherry picked from commit a9cde00c5c)

Conflicts:
	services/user/delete.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1736
(cherry picked from commit 008c0cc63d)

[DEADCODE] add exceptions

(cherry picked from commit 12ddd2b10e)

[MODERATION] Remove deadcode (squash)

- Remove deadcode that's no longer used by Forgejo.

(cherry picked from commit 0faeab4fa9)

[MODERATION] Add repo transfers to blocked functionality (squash)

- When someone gets blocked, remove all pending repository transfers
from the blocked user to the doer.
- Do not allow to start transferring repositories to the doer as blocked user.
- Added unit testing.
- Added integration testing.

(cherry picked from commit 8a3caac330)
(cherry picked from commit a92b4cfeb6)
(cherry picked from commit acaaaf07d9)
(cherry picked from commit 735818863c)
(cherry picked from commit f50fa43b32)
(cherry picked from commit e166836433)
(cherry picked from commit 82a0e4a381)
(cherry picked from commit ff233c19c4)
(cherry picked from commit 8ad87d215f)

[MODERATION] Fix unblock action (squash)

- Pass the whole context instead of only giving pieces.
- This fixes CSRF not correctly being inserted into the unblock buttons.

(cherry picked from commit 2aa51922ba)
(cherry picked from commit 7ee8db0f01)
(cherry picked from commit e4f8b999bc)
(cherry picked from commit 05aea60b13)
(cherry picked from commit dc0d61b012)
(cherry picked from commit f53fa583de)
(cherry picked from commit c65b89a58d)
(cherry picked from commit 69e50b9969)
(cherry picked from commit ec127440b8)

[MODERATION] cope with shared fixtures

* There is one more issue in the fixtures and this breaks some tests
* The users in the shared fixtures were renamed for clarity and that
  breaks some tests

(cherry picked from commit 707a4edbdf)

Conflicts:
	modules/indexer/issues/indexer_test.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1508
(cherry picked from commit 82cc044366)
(cherry picked from commit 2776aec7e8)
(cherry picked from commit 1fbde36dc7)
(cherry picked from commit 1293db3c4e)
(cherry picked from commit 6476802175)
(cherry picked from commit 5740f2fc83)
(cherry picked from commit afc12d7b6e)

[MODERATION] Fix transfer confirmation (squash)

- Fix problem caused by the clearer confirmation for dangerous actions commit.

(cherry picked from commit 3488f4a9cb)
(cherry picked from commit ed7de91f6a)
(cherry picked from commit 2d97929b9b)
(cherry picked from commit 50d035a7b0)
(cherry picked from commit 0a0c07d78a)
(cherry picked from commit 85e55c4dbc)
(cherry picked from commit d8282122ad)
(cherry picked from commit 3f0b3b6cc5)

[MODERATION] Purge issues on user deletion (squash)

(cherry picked from commit 4f529d9596)
(cherry picked from commit f0e3acadd3)
(cherry picked from commit 682c4effe6)
(cherry picked from commit e43c2d84fd)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8e53ccc7)
(cherry picked from commit a9eb7ac783)

[MODERATION] Purge issues on user deletion (squash) revert shared fixtures workarounds

(cherry picked from commit 7224653a40)
(cherry picked from commit aa6e8672f9)
(cherry picked from commit 58c7947e95)
(cherry picked from commit f1aacb1851)
(cherry picked from commit 0bf174af87)
(cherry picked from commit f9706f4335)

[MODERATION] Prepare moderation for context locale changes (squash)

- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1711

(cherry picked from commit 2e289baea9)
(cherry picked from commit 97b16bc19a)

[MODERATION] User blocking (squash) do not use shared fixture

It conflicts with a fixtured added in the commit
Fix comment permissions (#28213) (#28216)

(cherry picked from commit ab40799dcab24e9f495d765268b791931da81684)
(cherry picked from commit 996c92cafd)
(cherry picked from commit 259912e3a6)

Conflicts:
	options/locale/locale_en-US.ini
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1921
(cherry picked from commit 1e82abc032)
(cherry picked from commit a176fee160)
(cherry picked from commit 0480b76dfe)
(cherry picked from commit 4bc06b7b38)
(cherry picked from commit 073094cf72)
(cherry picked from commit ac6201c647)
(cherry picked from commit 7e0812674d)
(cherry picked from commit 068c741e56)

Conflicts:
	models/repo_transfer.go
	models/repo_transfer_test.go
	routers/web/user/profile.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2298
2024-02-05 15:56:45 +01:00
Earl Warren
c7a389f2b2
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.

A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.

That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.

A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.

(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)

Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go

That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.

(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)

Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.

(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)

Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation

The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition

The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.

(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)

Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation

The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.

(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)

Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date

Those unit tests are added:

- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate

- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)

Pettier code to set the update time of comments

Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)

XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.

(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)

Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.

When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.

This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.

(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)

Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests

Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.

The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate

(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)

Conflicts:
	services/issue/issue.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
	https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)

[this is a follow-up to PR #764]

When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.

-----

Comment:

While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...

I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go

Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c87)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f61)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c)

[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param

See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a

(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a49)
(cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c2)
(cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a74)
2024-02-05 14:44:33 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
5f82ead13c
Simplify how git repositories are opened (#28937)
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.

## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:

Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:

```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```

Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:

```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```

Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.

## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-27 21:09:51 +01:00
Adam Majer
d68a613ba8
Add support for sha256 repositories (#23894)
Currently only SHA1 repositories are supported by Gitea. This adds
support for alternate SHA256 with the additional aim of easier support
for additional hash types in the future.

Fixes: #13794
Limited by: https://github.com/go-git/go-git/issues/899
Depend on: #28138

<img width="776" alt="图片" src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/81045/5448c9a7-608e-4341-a149-5dd0069c9447">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2024-01-19 17:05:02 +01:00
Gwyneth Morgan
2c3da59e27
Add ability to see open and closed issues at the same time (#28757)
By clicking the currently active "Open" or "Closed" filter button in the
issue list, the user can toggle that filter off in order to see all
issues regardless of state. The URL "state" parameter will be set to
"all" and the "Open"/"Closed" button will not show as active.
2024-01-15 15:07:22 +00:00
KN4CK3R
637451a45e
Rework markup link rendering (#26745)
Fixes #26548

This PR refactors the rendering of markup links. The old code uses
`strings.Replace` to change some urls while the new code uses more
context to decide which link should be generated.

The added tests should ensure the same output for the old and new
behaviour (besides the bug).

We may need to refactor the rendering a bit more to make it clear how
the different helper methods render the input string. There are lots of
options (resolve links / images / mentions / git hashes / emojis / ...)
but you don't really know what helper uses which options. For example,
we currently support images in the user description which should not be
allowed I think:

<details>
  <summary>Profile</summary> 

https://try.gitea.io/KN4CK3R

![grafik](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/1666336/109ae422-496d-4200-b52e-b3a528f553e5)

</details>

---------

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-01-15 08:49:24 +00:00
Jimmy Praet
5d3fdd1212
Add branch protection setting for ignoring stale approvals (#28498)
Fixes #27114.

* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.

For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.

So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 07:20:01 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
70c4aad8e1
Move more functions to db.Find (#28419)
Following #28220

This PR move more functions to use `db.Find`.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2024-01-15 02:19:25 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
da58bb85fa
Upgrade xorm to new version which supported update join for all supported databases (#28590)
Fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28547#issuecomment-1867740842

Since https://gitea.com/xorm/xorm/pulls/2383 merged, xorm now supports
UPDATE JOIN.
To keep consistent from different databases, xorm use
`engine.Join().Update`, but the actural generated SQL are different
between different databases.

For MySQL, it's `UPDATE talbe1 JOIN table2 ON join_conditions SET xxx
Where xxx`.

For MSSQL, it's `UPDATE table1 SET xxx FROM TABLE1, TABLE2 WHERE
join_conditions`.

For SQLITE per https://www.sqlite.org/lang_update.html, sqlite support
`UPDATE table1 SET xxx FROM table2 WHERE join conditions` from
3.33.0(2020-8-14).

POSTGRES is the same as SQLITE.
2023-12-31 05:00:35 +00:00
wxiaoguang
e743570f65
Refactor timeutil package (#28623)
1. make names more readable
2. remove unused FormatLong/FormatShort
3. use `FormatDate` instead of `Format "2006-01-02"`
2023-12-28 10:09:57 +00:00
wxiaoguang
f3999888c0
Refactor some legacy code and remove unused code (#28622)
1. use slices.Contains, remove Int64sContains
2. use HashEmail, remove base.EncodeMD5
3. remove BasicAuthEncode, IsLetter
2023-12-28 09:38:59 +00:00
delvh
778ad795fd
Refactor deletion (#28610)
Introduce the new generic deletion methods
- `func DeleteByID[T any](ctx context.Context, id int64) (int64, error)`
- `func DeleteByIDs[T any](ctx context.Context, ids ...int64) error`
- `func Delete[T any](ctx context.Context, opts FindOptions) (int64,
error)`

So, we no longer need any specific deletion method and can just use
the generic ones instead.

Replacement of #28450

Closes #28450

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-12-25 21:25:29 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
0407a402bb
Revert "improve possible performance bottleneck (#28547)" (#28593)
This reverts commit b35d3fddfa.

This is totally wrong. I think `Update join` hasn't been supported well
by xorm.

I just revert the PR and will try to send another one.
2023-12-25 06:52:17 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b35d3fddfa
improve possible performance bottleneck (#28547)
Replace #28500

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-12-21 23:25:57 +01:00