Commit graph

21 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Earl Warren
50822f361e
Do not update PRs based on events that happened before they existed
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* A Created field is added to the Issue table
* The Created field is set to the time (with nano resolution) on creation
* Record the nano time repo_module.PushUpdateOptions is created by the hook
* The decision to update a pull request created before a commit was
  pushed is based on the time (with nano resolution) the git hook
  was run and the Created field

It ensures the following happens:

* commit C is pushed
* the git hook queues AddTestPullRequestTask for processing and returns with success
* TestPullRequest is not called yet
* a pull request P with commit C as the head is created
* TestPullRequest runs and ignores P because it was created after the commit was received

When the "created" column is NULL, no verification is done, pull
requests that were created before the column was created in the
database cannot be newer than the latest call to a git hook.

Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
(cherry picked from commit 998a431747)

Conflicts:
	models/forgejo_migrations/migrate.go
	see https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3165#issuecomment-1755941
	services/pull/pull.go
	trivial conflicts
2024-04-12 10:41:19 +02:00
Earl Warren
ceea9c4334
Revert "avoid superfluous synchronized pull_request run when opening a PR"
The fix against the race incorrectly assumes the sha of the commit being
pushed belongs to the base repository. It finds the highest possible
pull request ID from the head repository instead of looking it up in
the base repository.

Figuring out if a PR was created in the future based on the highest
index of the base repository would require collecting all of them
because there is no way to know in advance which repository may be
involved in the race.

Fixing this race can be done either by:

* Introducing a new field in the pull_request table https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2842
  which feels more like a hack than a real solution
* Refactoring the logic
  which would be a significant undertaking

The race has been in the codebase for a very long time and manifests
itself in the CI, when events happen in quick succession. The only
concrete manifestation was however fixed by https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009

Since this race now only exists in theory and not in practice, let's
revert this bugous commit until a proper solution is implemented.

Fixes: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2817

This reverts commit 036f1eddc5.

Conflicts:
	services/pull/pull.go
2024-03-28 07:08:17 +01:00
wxiaoguang
e5920b4a62
Refactor StringsToInt64s (#29967)
And close #27176

(cherry picked from commit cdb4d1a8db096d60dba04728924dab85def45b19)
2024-03-26 19:04:26 +01:00
qwerty287
1608ef0ce9
Add API to get merged PR of a commit (#29243)
Adds a new API `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/commits/{sha}/pull` that allows
you to get the merged PR associated to a commit.

---------

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
(cherry picked from commit 0a426cc575734e5eff410d6a790f40473117f753)
2024-02-26 22:30:26 +01:00
Earl Warren
036f1eddc5
[GITEA] avoid superfluous synchronized pull_request run when opening a PR (#2236)
* Split TestPullRequest out of AddTestPullRequestTask
* Before scheduling the task, AddTestPullRequestTask stores the max
  index of the repository
* When the task runs, it does not take into account pull requests that
  have an index higher than the recorded max index

When AddTestPullRequestTask is called with isSync == true, it is the
direct consequence of a new commit being pushed. Forgejo knows nothing
of this new commit yet. If a PR is created later and its head
references the new commit, it will have an index that is higher and
must not be taken into account. It would be acting and triggering a
notification for a PR based on an event that happened before it
existed.

Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2236
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
(cherry picked from commit b3be895a30)
2024-02-05 16:57:58 +01:00
JakobDev
ebe803e514
Penultimate round of db.DefaultContext refactor (#27414)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-10-11 04:24:07 +00:00
JakobDev
c548dde205
More refactoring of db.DefaultContext (#27083)
Next step of #27065
2023-09-15 06:13:19 +00:00
Nanguan Lin
da50be7360
Replace 'userxx' with 'orgxx' in all test files when the user type is org (#27052)
Currently 'userxx' and 'orgxx' are both used as username in test files
when the user type is org, which is confusing. This PR replaces all
'userxx' with 'orgxx' when the user type is org(`user.type==1`).
Some non-trivial changes
1. Rename `user3` dir to `org3` in `tests/git-repositories-meta` 
2. Change `end` in `issue reference` because 'org3' is one char shorter
than 'user3'

![ksnip_20230913-112819](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/442988c5-4cf4-49b8-aa01-4dd6bf0ca954)
3. Change the search result number of `user/repo2` because
`user3/repo21` can't be searched now

![ksnip_20230913-112931](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/d9ebeba4-479f-4110-9a85-825efbc981fd)
4. Change the first org name getting from API because the result is
ordered by alphabet asc and now `org 17` is before `org25`
![JW8U7NIO(J$H
_YCRB36H)T](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/f55a685c-cf24-40e5-a87f-3a2327319548)
![)KFD411O4I8RB5ZOH7E0
Z3](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/70063547/a0dc3299-249c-46f6-91cb-d15d4ee88dd5)

Other modifications are just find all and replace all.
Unit tests with SQLite are all passed.

---------

Co-authored-by: caicandong <1290147055@qq.com>
2023-09-14 02:59:53 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
e3ed67859a
Move some functions to service layer (#26969) 2023-09-08 21:09:23 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
36eb3c433a
Add transaction when creating pull request created dirty data (#26259)
Fix #26129
Replace #26258 

This PR will introduce a transaction on creating pull request so that if
some step failed, it will rollback totally. And there will be no dirty
pull request exist.

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-08-10 02:39:21 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
b167f35113
Add context parameter to some database functions (#26055)
To avoid deadlock problem, almost database related functions should be
have ctx as the first parameter.
This PR do a refactor for some of these functions.
2023-07-22 22:14:27 +08:00
Cory Todd
179704695c
Fix duplicate Reviewed-by trailers (#24796)
Enable deduplication of unofficial reviews. When pull requests are
configured to include all approvers, not just official ones, in the
default merge messages it was possible to generate duplicated
Reviewed-by lines for a single person. Add an option to find only
distinct reviews for a given query.

fixes #24795

---------

Signed-off-by: Cory Todd <cory.todd@canonical.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-06-09 16:34:49 +02:00
Vladimir Buyanov
3bdd48016f
Add codeowners feature (#24910)
Hello.
This PR adds a github like configuration for the CODEOWNERS file.

Resolves: #10161
2023-06-08 16:56:05 +08:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
sillyguodong
e962ade99c
Refresh the refernce of the closed PR when reopening (#24231)
Close #24213 
Replace #23830

#### Cause

- Before, in order to making PR can get latest commit after reopening,
the `ref`(${REPO_PATH}/refs/pull/${PR_INDEX}/head) of evrey closed PR
will be updated when pushing commits to the `head branch` of the closed
PR.

#### Changes

- For closed PR , won't perform these behavior: insert`comment`, push
`notification` (UI and email), exectue
[pushToBaseRepo](7422503341/services/pull/pull.go (L409))
function and trigger `action` any more when pushing to the `head branch`
of the closed PR.
- Refresh the reference of the PR when reopening the closed PR (**even
if the head branch has been deleted before**). Make the reference of PR
consistent with the `head branch`.
2023-05-08 14:39:32 +08:00
KN4CK3R
f1173d6879
Use more specific test methods (#24265)
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-04-22 17:56:27 -04:00
sillyguodong
2f49b55c19
Fix cannot reopen after pushing commits to a closed PR (#23189)
Close: #22784

1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.

2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)

3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call  function `CreatePushPullComment()`.

067b0c2664/services/pull/pull.go (L260-L282)
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)

4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`.  PR is closed now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-03-03 21:16:58 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
KN4CK3R
044c754ea5
Add context.Context to more methods (#21546)
This PR adds a context parameter to a bunch of methods. Some helper
`xxxCtx()` methods got replaced with the normal name now.

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-11-19 16:12:33 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
86c85c19b6
Refactor AssertExistsAndLoadBean to use generics (#20797)
* Refactor AssertExistsAndLoadBean to use generics

* Fix tests

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2022-08-16 10:22:25 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
1a9821f57a
Move issues related files into models/issues (#19931)
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access

* fix test

* fix git test

* Move functions sequence

* Some improvements per @KN4CK3R and @delvh

* Move issues related code to models/issues

* Move some issues related sub package

* Merge

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Fix test

* Rename some files
2022-06-13 17:37:59 +08:00
Renamed from models/pull_test.go (Browse further)