This PR adds colorblind theme variants of the forgejo themes. I duplicated the forjego light and dark themes and only changed the lines related to diff colors for added and removed rows/words.
I am not a designer, and I am also colorblind, so better suggestions of colors are most welcome. However, this is a good start as I can at least personally see the colors now. I got the colors for the dark theme from the GitHub diff colors, the light ones I couldn't get from GitHub as they use white as a plain background, which Forgejo's theme doesn't, so they were decided on after a bit of random testing.
Resolves#986
(cherry picked from commit dcdb4a372d)
[FEAT] add Forgejo Git Service (squash) register a Forgejo factory
If the Forgejo factory for the Forgejo service is not registered,
newDownloader will fallback to a git service and not migrate issues
etc.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1678
(cherry picked from commit 51938cd161)
[FEAT] add Forgero Git Service
Signed-off-by: cassiozareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a878adfe62)
Adding description and Forgejo SVG
(cherry picked from commit 13738c0380)
Undo reordering and tmpl redirection
(cherry picked from commit 9ae51c46f4)
(cherry picked from commit 70fffdc61d)
(cherry picked from commit c0ebfa9da3)
(cherry picked from commit 9922c92787)
(cherry picked from commit 00c0effbc7)
(cherry picked from commit e4c9525b13)
(cherry picked from commit 09d7b83211)
(cherry picked from commit bbcd5975c9)
(cherry picked from commit 55c70a0e18)
(cherry picked from commit 76596410c0)
(cherry picked from commit 1308043931)
(cherry picked from commit 919d6aedfe)
[FEAT] add Forgero Git Service (squash) more tests
Previously only Gitea service was being tested under self-hosted migrations. Since Forgejo is also self-hosted and in fact use the same downloader/migrator we can add to this suite another test that will do the same, migrating the same repository under the same local instance but for the Forgejo service (represented by 9)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1709
Co-authored-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 40a4b8f1a8)
(cherry picked from commit 3198b4a642)
(cherry picked from commit 4edda1f389)
(cherry picked from commit 4d91b77d29)
(cherry picked from commit afe85c52e3)
(cherry picked from commit 5ea7df79ad)
(cherry picked from commit a667182542)
(cherry picked from commit a9bebb1e71)
(cherry picked from commit 4831a89e46)
(cherry picked from commit e02a74651f)
(cherry picked from commit 05dcef59aa)
(cherry picked from commit c8bac187f9)
(cherry picked from commit c87903a0cc)
As the docs of codeberg refer to the strings printed by the Forgejo
ssh servers, this is user-facing and is nice to update to the new
product name.
(cherry picked from commit 103991d73f)
(cherry picked from commit 2a0d3f85f1)
(cherry picked from commit eb2b4ce388)
(cherry picked from commit 0998b51716)
[BRANDING] forgejo log message
(cherry picked from commit d51a046ebe)
(cherry picked from commit d66e1c7b6e)
(cherry picked from commit b5bffe4ce8)
(cherry picked from commit 3fa776d856)
(cherry picked from commit 18d064f472)
(cherry picked from commit c95094e355)
(cherry picked from commit 5784290bc4)
(cherry picked from commit aee336886b)
(cherry picked from commit ec2f60b516)
(cherry picked from commit 7af742a284)
(cherry picked from commit f279e2a264)
(cherry picked from commit fd38cfb14e)
(cherry picked from commit 64c8226618)
(cherry picked from commit b546fb2304)
(cherry picked from commit ad10202177)
(cherry picked from commit c89cab9c2b)
(cherry picked from commit 9579322ec2)
(cherry picked from commit 16b44ad18d)
(cherry picked from commit 2571ff703b)
(cherry picked from commit ad61d9ce9b)
(cherry picked from commit 9b2c45d4d3)
(cherry picked from commit ed01b79a59)
(cherry picked from commit d040b66427)
(cherry picked from commit ffe0bbea48)
(cherry picked from commit 4c1b2c409b)
(cherry picked from commit 3d8338ed10)
(cherry picked from commit a92f044ea9)
[BRANDING] link to forgejo.org/docs instead of docs.gitea.io
(cherry picked from commit 3efafd0e08)
(cherry picked from commit 148185e34b)
(cherry picked from commit 834e264698)
(cherry picked from commit e72fa6eb1e)
[BRANDING] link to forgejo.org/docs instead of docs.gitea.io
Fix the link that was 404.
(cherry picked from commit ae515d7258)
(cherry picked from commit facc2367f0)
(cherry picked from commit 25784b9f21)
(cherry picked from commit 2efc6138d9)
(cherry picked from commit b9d0871631)
(cherry picked from commit f0446e51b9)
(cherry picked from commit 1638aa67fb)
(cherry picked from commit 290db6a018)
(cherry picked from commit 89b87cf542)
(cherry picked from commit 656ed94962)
(cherry picked from commit 036f879f96)
(cherry picked from commit 69eea35f81)
(cherry picked from commit b72e3f4a92)
(cherry picked from commit af606b8574)
(cherry picked from commit 7e47f8135c)
(cherry picked from commit 0e5218cc53)
(cherry picked from commit 7c2a20a528)
(cherry picked from commit 4e94006363)
(cherry picked from commit e47cdfc43f)
(cherry picked from commit 1dcb3e1da4)
(cherry picked from commit 67367c4e0f)
(cherry picked from commit 252087d1ff)
(cherry picked from commit f5977a43e5)
Conflicts:
templates/base/head_navbar.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 594938eb15)
(cherry picked from commit 0257d038a7)
(cherry picked from commit 72821dd140)
[BRANDING] s/gitea/forgejo/ in HTML placeholders
Replaced Gitea branding with Forgejo for input placeholders
Closes: #686
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/752
(cherry picked from commit 6160d37ca9)
(cherry picked from commit df61138c7e)
(cherry picked from commit 1f30566c3f)
(cherry picked from commit 539bb825f5)
(cherry picked from commit bee0f66c86)
(cherry picked from commit 60ad005c95)
(cherry picked from commit 282e26222e)
(cherry picked from commit f9ca551f3d)
(cherry picked from commit b2e04b04c3)
(cherry picked from commit c8f395a03c)
(cherry picked from commit 0d58ce49ae)
(cherry picked from commit c602ddf91e)
(cherry picked from commit 029e37271e)
(cherry picked from commit fdaa96b3cc)
(cherry picked from commit 515d99e27d)
(cherry picked from commit da73274ba1)
(cherry picked from commit ce90b696a0)
(cherry picked from commit b6bf98763b)
(cherry picked from commit 5b380d22d7)
[BRANDING] How to start a runner: URL to Actions admin documentation
(cherry picked from commit da91799e6f)
(cherry picked from commit 28231663b6)
(cherry picked from commit 533a90345b)
(cherry picked from commit 6a0e4e55dd)
(cherry picked from commit f47cd611c6)
(cherry picked from commit 001264b784)
(cherry picked from commit e4099e9bb9)
(cherry picked from commit 3a1885649f)
(cherry picked from commit c42802c710)
(cherry picked from commit a611ce8d6d)
(cherry picked from commit a3d7d10a80)
(cherry picked from commit 52adde671f)
(cherry picked from commit c9a3820fef)
(cherry picked from commit dce40997c9)
(cherry picked from commit 312a6b92f3)
[BRANDING] package templates & links
- Change Gitea to Forgejo where necessary.
- Point all documentation to Forgejo's documentation.
- Resolves#992
(cherry picked from commit d0b78a6ede)
(cherry picked from commit e2382f30ba)
(cherry picked from commit c41cf05a33)
(cherry picked from commit 797e598ae7)
(cherry picked from commit 970031a1c2)
(cherry picked from commit 0c1180e2e1)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/alpine.tmpl
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
templates/package/content/chef.tmpl
templates/package/content/composer.tmpl
templates/package/content/conan.tmpl
templates/package/content/conda.tmpl
templates/package/content/container.tmpl
templates/package/content/cran.tmpl
templates/package/content/debian.tmpl
templates/package/content/generic.tmpl
templates/package/content/go.tmpl
templates/package/content/helm.tmpl
templates/package/content/maven.tmpl
templates/package/content/npm.tmpl
templates/package/content/nuget.tmpl
templates/package/content/pub.tmpl
templates/package/content/pypi.tmpl
templates/package/content/rpm.tmpl
templates/package/content/rubygems.tmpl
templates/package/content/swift.tmpl
templates/package/content/vagrant.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit 42ac9ff2ab)
(cherry picked from commit e390000bce)
(cherry picked from commit 56a437b29b)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1466
[BRANDING] s/Gitea/Forgejo/ in user visible help & comments
- Modify the README of the docker directory to point to the relevant
docker files and documentation for Forgejo.
(cherry picked from commit aca6371215)
(cherry picked from commit 0ba96b1bc4)
(cherry picked from commit 5c8e6b53f1)
Conflicts:
docker/README.md
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1351
(cherry picked from commit b3121c8004)
(cherry picked from commit 607f870416)
(cherry picked from commit 191d96afe4)
[BRANDING] healthcheck/check.go
(cherry picked from commit d703a236ce)
(cherry picked from commit d84ce3ff20)
(cherry picked from commit 2dbb844606)
(cherry picked from commit 14d3ae7e3a)
[BRANDING] s/Gitea/Forgejo/g in CLI output
(cherry picked from commit 7543c126bb)
(cherry picked from commit b66f422fc3)
(cherry picked from commit a81e4e46f3)
[BRANDING] Gitea->Forgejo in mailer code
(cherry picked from commit b91afea4ff)
(cherry picked from commit 5d7428167c)
(cherry picked from commit ed8101ba6c)
[BRANDING] use 'Forgejo' for Discord, Packagist, and Slack webhooks
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1387
(cherry picked from commit 7dc3a05f5b)
(cherry picked from commit 133f2fc6cc)
[BRANDING] cmd/manager.go
(cherry picked from commit d1dba2c79d)
[BRANDING] pyproject.toml
(cherry picked from commit 7e8c868db2)
(cherry picked from commit 2395995c8b)
(cherry picked from commit dd6fbbf332)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/cargo.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1548
(cherry picked from commit 6f9a5d5cab)
(cherry picked from commit d0635c4a07)
(cherry picked from commit 5f9a8c5744)
(cherry picked from commit 10b96c4567)
(cherry picked from commit 717d52e928)
(cherry picked from commit 5debdb103e)
(cherry picked from commit ded1c1700e)
(cherry picked from commit 52aa23cf7a)
(cherry picked from commit 882c942b06)
(cherry picked from commit 73fc2d2ea8)
Conflicts:
cmd/actions.go
cmd/doctor.go
cmd/keys.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1976
(cherry picked from commit 6180ef24dc)
(cherry picked from commit 8970fa2bf8)
Conflicts:
templates/package/content/debian.tmpl
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2074
Fix a typo in docker/README.md
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 2e5df79dfb)
(cherry picked from commit 2bf6ce5b81)
(cherry picked from commit 8ec779277d)
(cherry picked from commit 6048fc66e8)
(cherry picked from commit 162538c722)
(cherry picked from commit 646bb99650)
- This is a 'front-port' of the already existing patch on v1.21 and
v1.20, but applied on top of what Gitea has done to rework the LTA
mechanism. Forgejo will stick with the reworked mechanism by the Forgejo
Security team for the time being. The removal of legacy code (AES-GCM) has been
left out.
- The current architecture is inherently insecure, because you can
construct the 'secret' cookie value with values that are available in
the database. Thus provides zero protection when a database is
dumped/leaked.
- This patch implements a new architecture that's inspired from: [Paragonie Initiative](https://paragonie.com/blog/2015/04/secure-authentication-php-with-long-term-persistence#secure-remember-me-cookies).
- Integration testing is added to ensure the new mechanism works.
- Removes a setting, because it's not used anymore.
(cherry picked from commit e3d6622a63)
(cherry picked from commit fef1a6dac5)
(cherry picked from commit b0c5165145)
(cherry picked from commit 7ad51b9f8d)
(cherry picked from commit 64f053f383)
(cherry picked from commit f5e78e4c20)
Conflicts:
services/auth/auth_token_test.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2069
(cherry picked from commit f69fc23d4b)
(cherry picked from commit d955ab3ab0)
(cherry picked from commit 9220088f90)
(cherry picked from commit c73ac63696)
(cherry picked from commit 747a176048)
Conflicts:
models/user/user.go
routers/web/user/setting/account.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2295
This field adds the possibility to set the update date when modifying
an issue through the API.
A 'NoAutoDate' in-memory field is added in the Issue struct.
If the update_at field is set, NoAutoDate is set to true and the
Issue's UpdatedUnix field is filled.
That information is passed down to the functions that actually updates
the database, which have been modified to not auto update dates if
requested.
A guard is added to the 'EditIssue' API call, to checks that the
udpate_at date is between the issue's creation date and the current
date (to avoid 'malicious' changes). It also limits the new feature
to project's owners and admins.
(cherry picked from commit c524d33402)
Add a SetIssueUpdateDate() function in services/issue.go
That function is used by some API calls to set the NoAutoDate and
UpdatedUnix fields of an Issue if an updated_at date is provided.
(cherry picked from commit f061caa655)
Add an updated_at field to the API calls related to Issue's Labels.
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's labels.
(cherry picked from commit ea36cf80f5)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the issue's comment created to inform
about the modification of the issue's content, and is set as the
asset creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 96150971ca)
Checking Issue changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPIEditIssueWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 4926a5d7a2)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment creation
The update date is used as the comment creation date, and is applied to
the issue as the update creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 76c8faecdc)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for issue's comment edition
The update date is used as the comment update date, and is applied to
the issue as an update date.
(cherry picked from commit cf787ad7fd)
Add an updated_at field to the API call for comment's attachment creation
The update date is applied to the comment, and is set as the asset
creation date.
(cherry picked from commit 1e4ff424d3)
Checking Comment changes, with and without providing an updated_at date
Those unit tests are added:
- TestAPICreateCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithNoAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentWithNoAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit da932152f1)
Pettier code to set the update time of comments
Now uses sess.AllCols().NoAutoToime().SetExpr("updated_unix", ...)
XORM is smart enough to compose one single SQL UPDATE which all
columns + updated_unix.
(cherry picked from commit 1f6a42808d)
Issue edition: Keep the max of the milestone and issue update dates.
When editing an issue via the API, an updated_at date can be provided.
If the EditIssue call changes the issue's milestone, the milestone's
update date is to be changed accordingly, but only with a greater
value.
This ensures that a milestone's update date is the max of all issue's
update dates.
(cherry picked from commit 8f22ea182e)
Rewrite the 'AutoDate' tests using subtests
Also add a test to check the permissions to set a date, and a test
to check update dates on milestones.
The tests related to 'AutoDate' are:
- TestAPIEditIssueAutoDate
- TestAPIAddIssueLabelsAutoDate
- TestAPIEditIssueMilestoneAutoDate
- TestAPICreateIssueAttachmentAutoDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAutoDate
- TestAPIEditCommentWithDate
- TestAPICreateCommentAttachmentAutoDate
(cherry picked from commit 961fd13c55)
(cherry picked from commit d52f4eea44)
(cherry picked from commit 3540ea2a43)
Conflicts:
services/issue/issue.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1415
(cherry picked from commit 56720ade00)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1462
(cherry picked from commit 47c78927d6)
(cherry picked from commit 2030f3b965)
(cherry picked from commit f02aeb7698)
Conflicts:
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_attachment.go
routers/api/v1/repo/issue_comment_attachment.go
https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1575
(cherry picked from commit d072525b35)
(cherry picked from commit 8424d0ab3d)
(cherry picked from commit 5cc62caec7)
(cherry picked from commit d6300d5dcd)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) apply the 'update_at' value to the cross-ref comments (#1676)
[this is a follow-up to PR #764]
When a comment of issue A referencing issue B is added with a forced 'updated_at' date, that date has to be applied to the comment created in issue B.
-----
Comment:
While trying my 'RoundUp migration script', I found that this case was forgotten in PR #764 - my apologies...
I'll try to write a functional test, base on models/issues/issue_xref_test.go
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1676
Co-authored-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
Co-committed-by: fluzz <fluzz@freedroid.org>
(cherry picked from commit ac4f727f63)
(cherry picked from commit 5110476ee9)
(cherry picked from commit 77ba6be1da)
(cherry picked from commit 9c8337b5c4)
(cherry picked from commit 1d689eb686)
(cherry picked from commit 511c519c87)
(cherry picked from commit 2f0b4a8f61)
(cherry picked from commit fdd4da111c)
[FEAT] allow setting the update date on issues and comments (squash) do not use token= query param
See https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/33439b733a
(cherry picked from commit c5139a75b9)
(cherry picked from commit c7b572c35d)
(cherry picked from commit aec7503ff6)
(cherry picked from commit 87c65f2a49)
(cherry picked from commit bd47ee33c2)
(cherry picked from commit f3dbd90a74)
Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28704
Example of an entry in the generated `APKINDEX` file:
```
C:Q1xCO3H9LTTEbhKt9G1alSC87I56c=
P:hello
V:2.12-r1
A:x86_64
T:The GNU Hello program produces a familiar, friendly greeting
U:https://www.gnu.org/software/hello/
L:GPL-3.0-or-later
S:15403
I:36864
o:hello
m:
t:1705934118
D:so:libc.musl-x86_64.so.1
p:cmd:hello=2.12-r1
i:foobar=1.0 !baz
k:42
```
the `i:` and `k:` entries are new.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Fixes#28660
Fixes an admin api bug related to `user.LoginSource`
Fixed `/user/emails` response not identical to GitHub api
This PR unifies the user update methods. The goal is to keep the logic
only at one place (having audit logs in mind). For example, do the
password checks only in one method not everywhere a password is updated.
After that PR is merged, the user creation should be next.
Emails from Gitea comments do not contain the username of the commenter
anywhere, only their display name, so it is not possible to verify who
made a comment from the email itself:
From: "Alice" <email@gitea>
X-Gitea-Sender: Alice
X-Gitea-Recipient: Bob
X-GitHub-Sender: Alice
X-GitHub-Recipient: Bob
This comment looks like it's from @alice.
The X-Gitea/X-GitHub headers also use display names, which is not very
reliable for filtering, and inconsistent with GitHub's behavior:
X-GitHub-Sender: lunny
X-GitHub-Recipient: gwymor
This change includes both the display name and username in the From
header, and switches the other headers from display name to username:
From: "Alice (@fakealice)" <email@gitea>
X-Gitea-Sender: fakealice
X-Gitea-Recipient: bob
X-GitHub-Sender: fakealice
X-GitHub-Recipient: bob
This comment looks like it's from @alice.
This change allows act_runner / actions_runner to use jwt tokens for
`ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN` that are compatible with
actions/upload-artifact@v4.
The official Artifact actions are now validating and extracting the jwt
claim scp to get the runid and jobid, the old artifact backend also
needs to accept the same token jwt.
---
Related to #28853
I'm not familar with the auth system, maybe you know how to improve this
I have tested
- the jwt token is a valid token for artifact uploading
- the jwt token can be parsed by actions/upload-artifact@v4 and passes
their scp claim validation
Next steps would be a new artifacts@v4 backend.
~~I'm linking the act_runner change soonish.~~
act_runner change to make the change effective and use jwt tokens
<https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/471>
In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.
This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.
## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:
Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:
```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```
Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:
```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```
Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.
## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fixes#28699
This PR implements the `MigrateRepository` method for `actionsNotifier`
to detect the schedules from the workflow files in the migrated
repository.
The method can't be called with an outer transaction because if the user
is not a collaborator the outer transaction will be rolled back even if
the inner transaction uses the no-error path.
`has == 0` leads to `return nil` which cancels the transaction. A
standalone call of this method does nothing but if used with an outer
transaction, that will be canceled.
Sometimes you need to work on a feature which depends on another (unmerged) feature.
In this case, you may create a PR based on that feature instead of the main branch.
Currently, such PRs will be closed without the possibility to reopen in case the parent feature is merged and its branch is deleted.
Automatic target branch change make life a lot easier in such cases.
Github and Bitbucket behave in such way.
Example:
$PR_1$: main <- feature1
$PR_2$: feature1 <- feature2
Currently, merging $PR_1$ and deleting its branch leads to $PR_2$ being closed without the possibility to reopen.
This is both annoying and loses the review history when you open a new PR.
With this change, $PR_2$ will change its target branch to main ($PR_2$: main <- feature2) after $PR_1$ has been merged and its branch has been deleted.
This behavior is enabled by default but can be disabled.
For security reasons, this target branch change will not be executed when merging PRs targeting another repo.
Fixes#27062Fixes#18408
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fixes#22236
---
Error occurring currently while trying to revert commit using read-tree
-m approach:
> 2022/12/26 16:04:43 ...rvices/pull/patch.go:240:AttemptThreeWayMerge()
[E] [63a9c61a] Unable to run read-tree -m! Error: exit status 128 -
fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree
> - fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree
We need to clone a non-bare repository for `git read-tree -m` to work.
bb371aee6e
adds support to create a non-bare cloned temporary upload repository.
After cloning a non-bare temporary upload repository, we [set default
index](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/main/services/repository/files/cherry_pick.go#L37)
(`git read-tree HEAD`).
This operation ends up resetting the git index file (see investigation
details below), due to which, we need to call `git update-index
--refresh` afterward.
Here's the diff of the index file before and after we execute
SetDefaultIndex: https://www.diffchecker.com/hyOP3eJy/
Notice the **ctime**, **mtime** are set to 0 after SetDefaultIndex.
You can reproduce the same behavior using these steps:
```bash
$ git clone https://try.gitea.io/me-heer/test.git -s -b main
$ cd test
$ git read-tree HEAD
$ git read-tree -m 1f085d7ed8 1f085d7ed8 9933caed00
error: Entry '1' not uptodate. Cannot merge.
```
After which, we can fix like this:
```
$ git update-index --refresh
$ git read-tree -m 1f085d7ed8 1f085d7ed8 9933caed00
```
As more and more options can be set for creating the repository, I don't
think we should put all of them into the creation web page which will
make things look complicated and confusing.
And I think we need some rules about how to decide which should/should
not be put in creating a repository page. One rule I can imagine is if
this option can be changed later and it's not a MUST on the creation,
then it can be removed on the page. So I found trust model is the first
one.
This PR removed the trust model selections on creating a repository web
page and kept others as before.
This is also a preparation for #23894 which will add a choice about SHA1
or SHA256 that cannot be changed once the repository created.
Fixes#26548
This PR refactors the rendering of markup links. The old code uses
`strings.Replace` to change some urls while the new code uses more
context to decide which link should be generated.
The added tests should ensure the same output for the old and new
behaviour (besides the bug).
We may need to refactor the rendering a bit more to make it clear how
the different helper methods render the input string. There are lots of
options (resolve links / images / mentions / git hashes / emojis / ...)
but you don't really know what helper uses which options. For example,
we currently support images in the user description which should not be
allowed I think:
<details>
<summary>Profile</summary>
https://try.gitea.io/KN4CK3R
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#27114.
* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.
For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.
So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fix#28157
This PR fix the possible bugs about actions schedule.
## The Changes
- Move `UpdateRepositoryUnit` and `SetRepoDefaultBranch` from models to
service layer
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when actions unit has been disabled
or global disabled.
- Remove schedules plan from database and cancel waiting & running
schedules tasks in this repository when default branch changed.
- If there's a error with the Git command in `checkIfPRContentChanged`
the stderr wasn't concatendated to the error, which results in still not
knowing why an error happend.
- Adds concatenation for stderr to the returned error.
- Ref: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2077
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
I noticed the `BuildAllRepositoryFiles` function under the Alpine folder
is unused and I thought it was a bug.
But I'm not sure about this. Was it on purpose?
#28361 introduced `syncBranchToDB` in `CreateNewBranchFromCommit`. This
PR will revert the change because it's unnecessary. Every push will
already be checked by `syncBranchToDB`.
This PR also created a test to ensure it's right.
Introduce the new generic deletion methods
- `func DeleteByID[T any](ctx context.Context, id int64) (int64, error)`
- `func DeleteByIDs[T any](ctx context.Context, ids ...int64) error`
- `func Delete[T any](ctx context.Context, opts FindOptions) (int64,
error)`
So, we no longer need any specific deletion method and can just use
the generic ones instead.
Replacement of #28450Closes#28450
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
