user, topic, project, label, milestone, repository, pull_request,
release, asset, comment, reaction, review providers
Signed-off-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Preserve file size when creating attachments
Introduced in c6f5029708
repoList.LoadAttributes has a ctx argument now
Rename `repo.GetOwner` to `repo.LoadOwner`
bd66fa586a
upgrade to the latest gof3
(cherry picked from commit c770713656)
[F3] ID remapping logic is in place, remove workaround
(cherry picked from commit d0fee30167)
[F3] it is experimental, do not enable by default
(cherry picked from commit de325b21d0)
(cherry picked from commit 547e7b3c40)
(cherry picked from commit 820df3a56b)
(cherry picked from commit eaba87689b)
(cherry picked from commit 1b86896b3b)
(cherry picked from commit 0046aac1c6)
(cherry picked from commit f14220df8f)
(cherry picked from commit 559b731001)
(cherry picked from commit 801f7d600d)
(cherry picked from commit 6aa76e9bcf)
The topics are saved in the `repo_topic` table.
They are also saved directly in the `repository` table.
Before this PR, only `AddTopic` and `SaveTopics` made sure the `topics`
field in the `repository` table was synced with the `repo_topic` table.
This PR makes sure `GenerateTopics` and `DeleteTopic`
also sync the `topics` in the repository table.
`RemoveTopicsFromRepo` doesn't need to sync the data
as it is only used to delete a repository.
Fixes#24820
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix#16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Fix#19513
This PR introduce a new db method `InTransaction(context.Context)`,
and also builtin check on `db.TxContext` and `db.WithTx`.
There is also a new method `db.AutoTx` has been introduced but could be used by other PRs.
`WithTx` will always open a new transaction, if a transaction exist in context, return an error.
`AutoTx` will try to open a new transaction if no transaction exist in context.
That means it will always enter a transaction if there is no error.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
A lot of our code is repeatedly testing if individual errors are
specific types of Not Exist errors. This is repetitative and unnecesary.
`Unwrap() error` provides a common way of labelling an error as a
NotExist error and we can/should use this.
This PR has chosen to use the common `io/fs` errors e.g.
`fs.ErrNotExist` for our errors. This is in some ways not completely
correct as these are not filesystem errors but it seems like a
reasonable thing to do and would allow us to simplify a lot of our code
to `errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist)` instead of
`package.IsErr...NotExist(err)`
I am open to suggestions to use a different base error - perhaps
`models/db.ErrNotExist` if that would be felt to be better.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
