Fixes#2173
~~Still requires a bit of work to do, I'm not 100% happy with this solution.~~
The idea is to copy the noarch package to the architectures available in the package repository.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2285
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Alexandre Oliveira <me+codeberg@aoalmeida.com>
Co-committed-by: Alexandre Oliveira <me+codeberg@aoalmeida.com>
Forgejo now has its own lifecycle and its version is derived from the
tag. The Gitea tags are no longer found in the Forgejo codebase and
can no longer be used for that purpose.
When a Forgejo release is published, for interoperability with the
existing tools in the ecosystem, it advertises the supported Gitea
version via /api/v1/version. It is set in the Makefile manually and
cannot be automatically set.
https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/delightful-forgejo#packaging
Existing Forgejo packages rely on the Makefile to build and the change
must be done in a way that tries to not break their assumptions. From
the point of view of a Forgejo package build, the following will
happen on the next major release:
- The package version will bump from v1.21.x to v7.0.0
- /api/v1/version will bump from v1.21.x to v1.22.0
- /api/forgejo/v1/version will bump from v6.x to v7.0.0
The Makefile uses the following variables:
GITEA_VERSION is returned by /api/v1/version
FORGEJO_VERSION is returned by /api/forgejo/v1/version
VERSION is used in the name the binary file and the source archive
Before:
GITEA_VERSION is the computed version
FORGEJO_VERSION is set manually
VERSION defaults to GITEA_VERSION
After:
FORGEJO_VERSION is the computed version
GITEA_VERSION is set manually
VERSION defaults to FORGEJO_VERSION
When the version is computed, it comes from:
- The content of the VERSION file if it exists. It is inserted in
the source archive because it does not contain a git repository
- Otherwise the output of `git describe`
Skip a HookEventPullRequestSync event if it has the same CommitSHA as an existing HookEventPullRequest event in the ActionRun table. A HookEventPullRequestSync event must only create an ActionRun if the CommitSHA is different from what it was when the PR was open.
This guards against a race that can happen when the following is done in parallel:
* A commit C is pushed to a repo on branch B
* A pull request with head on branch B
it is then possible that the pull request is created first, successfully. The commit that was just pushed is not known yet but the PR only references the repository and the B branch so it is fine.
A HookEventPullRequest event is sent to the notification queue but not processed immediately.
The commit C is pushed and processed successfully. Since the PR already exists and has a head that matches the branch, the head of the PR is updated with the commit C and a HookEventPullRequestSync event is sent to the notification queue.
The HookEventPullRequest event is processed and since the head of the PR was updated to be commit C, an ActionRun with CommitSHA C is created.
The HookEventPullRequestSync event is then processed and also has a CommitSHA equal to C.
Refs: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/2009
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/2314
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Commit 360b3fd17c (Include username in email headers (#28981),
2024-02-03) adds usernames to the From field of notification emails in
the form of `Display Name (@username)`, to prevent spoofing. However,
some email filtering software flags "@" in the display name part of the
From field as potential spoofing, as you could set the display name part
to another email address than the one you are sending from (e.g.
`From: "apparent@email-address" <actual@email-address>`). To avoid
being flagged, instead send emails from `Display Name (username)`.
Closes: #29107
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 5b2fd0fc19a2a77414c8e2989b4794b6617221f5)
