Gitea 1.22.1 was supposed to allow for team names of length 255 (up from
30) after the following PR was merged in:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/31410. However, the length of
team names was still limited to 30 as described in this issue:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31554.
One more change to _gitea_ needs to be made to allow for the longer team
names, as there is a 30 character limit here:
2c92c7c522/services/forms/org.go (L65)
This PR changes that value to 255.
(cherry picked from commit 4ea2a6de81ab6adde436d77e2743095fafa6a7a9)
- Don't show the labels-list element, if no labels are selected.
- The labels-list was taking up vertical space, even if no labels were
selected which caused an inconsistency in how the sidebar looked.
- Adds integration test
It is not for the developer to keep them sorted in a hierarchy when
the release they belong to can be deduced from the tag of the release
into which they were merged. The release notes assistant does that
work instead.
Some files appeared in more than one directory (feat and fix for
instance) when the PR contains multiple unrelated commits which is
what happens on a regular basis with the weekly cherry-pick of
Gitea. Those files were merged into one and each line changed to start
with a conventional commit prefix (feat: fix:).
Each line in a file will be a separate line in the release notes, they
are not groupped together even when they relate to the same PR. The
determination of the category in which they should be displayed will
be based on regular expressions using either the PR title or the line
to add to the release notes itself.
Unify the content of each file to either be a bullet list of
independent pull requests or be folded into a single line if it is
multiline. Multiline content belongs to the documentation.
Refs: https://code.forgejo.org/forgejo/release-notes-assistant
Refs: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4417 by adding a conditional branch to the `head_opengraph` template to match wiki pages. I tried to be consistent with the other types:
- `og:title` is the wiki page title
- `og:url` is built via `{{AppUrl}}{{.Link}}` like it is done for commit and file views. This has the caveat of doubling the slash (see test below). Should we `{{trimSuffix "/" AppUrl}}` to remove this, if sprig is available?
- `og:description` is the repository description to match GH behaviour. Also, the first sentences of the page might not be descriptive enough. Should we prefix the repo description with the repo name?
- `og:type` and `og:image` are common
Added a `TestOpenGraphProperties` integration test using existing fixtures. Coverage is not 100% but can be improved later.
## Output on a test repo
```html
<meta property="og:title" content="Project architecture">
<meta property="og:url" content="http://localhost:3000//xvello/wiki-test/wiki/Project-architecture">
<meta property="og:description" content="description for a test project">
<meta property="og:type" content="object">
<meta property="og:image" content="http://localhost:3000/avatars/3dd4d1e4eef065d1b4ad4bdb081ab6e7">
```
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4427
Co-authored-by: Xavier Vello <xavier.vello@gmail.com>
Co-committed-by: Xavier Vello <xavier.vello@gmail.com>
I noticed that Forgejo does not allow HTTP range requests when downloading artifacts. All other file downloads like releases and packages support them.
So I looked at the code and found that the artifact download endpoint uses a simple io.Copy to serve the file contents instead of using the established `ServeContentByReadSeeker` function which does take range requests into account.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4218
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: ThetaDev <thetadev@magenta.de>
Co-committed-by: ThetaDev <thetadev@magenta.de>
Add an empty hash `href="#"` attribute to anchors that did not yet have any `href` attribute, as a quick work-around to make those elements possible to interact with via keyboard. See discussion on linked issue (https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4273) for more information on how the button-like elements like this could eventually be improved even more.
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/4273.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/4375
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: banaanihillo <banaanihillo@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: banaanihillo <banaanihillo@noreply.codeberg.org>
