Regression of 8b54d38cbe.
This is 7.0 specific path for the issue. The design of this area is not compatible with 8.0, and thus there's no startightforward way to make it look like on 8.0.
The current format makes the text look somewhat like this:
```
testing.yml #15065 :Commit 103306f00c pushed by n0toose
```
This looks wrong. We will have to work on that list at a later point
in time anyways, as well as make the way that we separate information
in subheaders in lists like this one more consistent.
However, this should do for now.
This change should make each entry look like this instead:
```
testing.yml #15065 - Commit 103306f00c pushed by n0toose
```
(cherry picked from commit 870a1c85c7)
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30664.
Previous use was not a supported way by fomantic and the misuse only
became visible after the checkbox migration.
(cherry picked from commit 1a2ae64b16f10b8d1e17197d18b9eb373faf58db)
Also add a test for GogsDownloaderFactory.New() to make sure
that the URL of the source repository is parsed correctly.
When the source gogs instance is hosted at a subpath like `https://git.example.com/gogs/<username>/<reponame>` the migration fails.
This PR fixes that.
Co-authored-by: hecker <tomas.hecker@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3572
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
Co-committed-by: varp0n <tom@gkstn.de>
(cherry picked from commit 4a2959b3ec)
**Backport:** https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3504
If incoming email is configured and an email is sent, inline attachments are currently not added to the comment if it has the `Content-Disposition: inline` instead of `Content-Disposition: attachment` as e.g. with Apple Mail.
This adds inline attachments (`Content-Disposition: inline`) that *have a filename* as attachment to the comment. Other elements with `Content-Disposition: inline` are not attached as attachment to the comment.
In addition, a check has been added to prevent mails from being processed twice.
Fixes#3496
Co-authored-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3566
Reviewed-by: Beowulf <beowulf@beocode.eu>
Co-authored-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-committed-by: forgejo-backport-action <forgejo-backport-action@noreply.codeberg.org>
To be able to easily test cases where the repository does not have any
code, where the git repo itself is completely uninitialized, lets
support a case where the `AutoInit` property is false.
For the sake of backwards compatibility, if the option is not set either
way, it will default to `true`.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
When subscribing or unsubscribing to/from an issue on the web ui, the
request was posted to a route handled by `repo.IssueWatch`. This
function used `ctx.Req.PostForm.Get()`, erroneously.
`request.PostForm` is *only* available if `request.ParseForm()` has been
called before it. The function in question did not do that. Under some
circumstances, something, somewhere did end up calling `ParseForm()`,
but not in every scenario.
Since we do not need to check for multiple values, the easiest fix here
is to use `ctx.Req.PostFormValue`, which will call `ParseForm()` if
necessary.
Fixes#3516.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Add a new member to `DeclarativeRepoOptions`: `WikiBranch`. If
specified, create a Wiki with the given branch, and a single "Home"
page.
This will be used by an upcoming test.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Lets introduce a new helper function,
`CreateDeclarativeRepoWithOptions`! This is almost the same as the
existing `CreateDeclarativeRepo` helper, but instead of taking a list of
random parameters the author thought of at the time of its introduction,
it takes a `DeclarativeRepoOptions` struct, with optional members.
This makes it easier to extend the function, as new members can be added
without breaking or having to update existing callsites, as long as the
newly added members default to compatible values.
`CreateDeclarativeRepo` is then reimplemented on top of the new
function. Callsites aren't updated yet, we can do that organically,
whenever touching code that uses the older function.
No new functionality is introduced just yet, this is merely a refactor.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Backport #30770
If an user is deactivated, it should not be in the list of users who are
suggested to be assigned or review-requested.
old assignees or reviewers are not affected.
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
(cherry picked from commit 022eac4ac8e59f861237cc1e02f7ef117eaf8e30)
Conflicts:
models/repo/user_repo_test.go
because there is one less fixture user compared to Gitea
If `commitstatus_service.FindReposLastestCommitStatuses` receives no
repos in its params, short-circuit, and return early, without performing
any potentially expensive work.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 33cd8446d3)
When a logged in user with no repositories visits their dashboard, it will
display a search box that lists their own repositories.
This is served by the `repo.SearchRepos` handler, which in turn calls
`commitstatus_service.FindReposLastestCommitStatuses()` with an empty
repo list.
That, in turn, will call `git_model.FindBranchesByRepoAndBranchName()`,
with an empty map. With no map, `FindBranchesByRepoAndBranchName()` ends
up querying the entire `branch` table, because no conditions were set
up.
Armed with a gazillion repo & commit shas, we return to
`FindReposLastestCommitStatuses`, and promptly call
`git_model.GetLatestCommitStatusForPairs`, which constructs a monstrous
query with so many placeholders that the database tells us to go
somewhere else, and flips us off. At least on instances the size of
Codeberg. On smaller instances, it will eventually return, and throw
away all the data, and return an empty set, having performed all this
for naught.
We fix this by short-circuiting `FindBranchesByRepoAndBranchName`, and
returning fast if our inputs are empty.
A test case is included.
Fixes#3521.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 0d029ebe6d)
When mentioning a user, the markup post-processor did not handle the
case where the mentioned user did not exist well: it tried to skip to
the next node, which in turn, ended up skipping the rest of the line.
To fix this, lets skip just the mentioned, but non-existing user, and
continue processing the current node from there.
Fixes#3535.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 9a01062ae2)
