This is a continuation of #2728, with a test case added.
Fixes#2633.
I kept @zareck 's commit as is, because I believe it is correct. We can't move the check to `owner.CanForkRepo()`, because `owner` is the future owner of the forked repo, and may be an organization. We need to check the admin permission of the `doer`, like in the case of repository creation.
I verified that the test fails without the `ForkRepository` change, and passes with it.
Co-authored-by: Cassio Zareck <cassiomilczareck@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3277
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Co-committed-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
The global wiki editability can be set via the web UI, this patch makes
it possible to set the same thing via the API too. This is accomplished
by adjusting the GET and PATCH handlers of the
`/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}` route.
The first will include the property when checking the repo's settings,
the second allows a repo admin to change the setting too.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
- Previously translations were escaped, but now translations are
accepted as-is and will be rendered as HTML. Use `TrString` to escape
the translation value.
- Adds integration test.
- Regression of 65248945c9.
- Resolves#3260
The target_url is necessary for the UI, but missed in
commit_status_summary table. This PR fix it.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR adds a new table named commit status summary to reduce queries
from the commit status table. After this change, commit status summary
table will be used for the final result, commit status table will be for
details.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Many places have the following logic:
```go
func (jobs ActionJobList) GetRunIDs() []int64 {
ids := make(container.Set[int64], len(jobs))
for _, j := range jobs {
if j.RunID == 0 {
continue
}
ids.Add(j.RunID)
}
return ids.Values()
}
```
this introduces a `container.FilterMapUnique` function, which reduces
the code above to:
```go
func (jobs ActionJobList) GetRunIDs() []int64 {
return container.FilterMapUnique(jobs, func(j *ActionRunJob) (int64, bool) {
return j.RunID, j.RunID != 0
})
}
```
Conflicts:
models/issues/comment_list.go due to premature refactor in #3116
Only split the file into small ones (and rename AttentionTypes to
attentionTypes)
(cherry picked from commit 71706126b56616750a65290460fd211b9b8449da)
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Conflicts:
- modules/markup/markdown/goldmark.go
- modules/markup/markdown/transform_blockquote.go
Conflicts were resolved by favouring the Forgejo implementation:
I copied the Forgejo code to the same place Gitea copied them
to, and adjusted the imports accordingly.
Apart from conflict resolution, this also moves
`applyElementDir` from a local func in `goldmark.Transform` to a
method on `*ASTTransformer`, to make it callable from the
extracted functions.
Fix#30378
(cherry picked from commit 0fe9f93eb4c94d55e43b18b9c3cc6d513a34c0b5)
Conflicts:
- models/organization/org.go
- services/repository/delete.go
- services/user/delete.go
In all three cases, conflicts were resolved by manually adding
the lines added by the Gitea patch, keeping the Forgejo code
surrounding them.
- `RemoveFilesFromIndex` used an hardcoded empty commit ID for the SHA1
object format, this would result in an error if the repository was
initialized to use the sha256 object format. Get the object format of
the Git repository and use that to get the empty commit id.
- Adds unit test.
- Resolves#3184
- Add another selector to the list, which corresponds to the container
of the archive buttons on the release page of an repository.
- Seems like that 8d2b764607 missed
another case.
- Resolves#3180
Cookies may exist on "/subpath" and "/subpath/" for some legacy reasons (eg: changed CookiePath behavior in code). The legacy cookie should be removed correctly.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kyle D <kdumontnu@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit b18c04ebde94e23d97da4958173faea843d5344f)
Since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25686, a few `interface{}`
have sneaked into the codebase. Add this replacement to `make fmt` to
prevent this from happening again.
Ideally a linter would do this, but I haven't found any suitable.
(cherry picked from commit c77e8140bc2ac6521dbebfb77613dce2648bfcb8)
Conflicts:
- .gitattributes
Trivial conflict resolved by picking our choice of language
for `*.tmpl` files.
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30442
It's inconvenient to have new untracked files show up in git when
switching to older branches that had generated them.
Introduce a list of such files and folders to gitignore and
dockerignore.
(cherry picked from commit 68271834d6ae6d397b5a2048f9e515ff53735994)
- Switched to plain JavaScript
- Tested the commit graph and it works as before
# Demo using JavaScript without jQuery
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
(cherry picked from commit 25427e0aee435cdedb9f8aae58767174d877767f)
This patch improves the migration from gitbucket to gitea.
The gitbucket uses it's own internal perPage value (= 25) for paging and
ignore per_page arguments in the requested URL. This cause gitea to
migrate only 25 issues and 25 PRs from gitbucket repository. This may
not happens on old gitbucket. But recent gitbucket 4.40 or 4.38.4 has
this problem.
This patch change to use this internally hardcoded perPage of gitbucket
as gitea's maxPerPage numer when migrating from gitbucket. There are
several perPage values in gitbucket like 25 for Isseus/PRs and 10 for
Releases. Some of those API doesn't support paging yet. It sounds
difficult to implement, but using the minimum number among them worked
out very well. So, I use 10 in this patch.
Brief descriptions of problems and this patch are also available in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30316.
In addition, I'm not sure what kind of test cases are possible to write
here. It's a test for migration, so it requires testing gitbucket server
and gitea server, I guess. Please let me know if it is possible to write
such test cases here. Thanks!
(cherry picked from commit 7af074dbeebc3c863618992b43f84ec9e5ab9657)
